What the agent is actually worth.
Not a smaller team — a bigger one, without hiring. Put in your volume; we'll price the hours the agent hands back against the plan your traffic lands on.
Every assumption is sourced and editable. Nothing asks for your email.
Across every channel. That's about 9,600 incoming messages — the unit Cloodot meters.
Closed without a person touching them. 30% is where an untuned agent lands.
Salary plus benefits and payroll taxes — the loaded cost, not the offer letter.
- $30an hour of loaded payroll
- 2.0 minof paid time per conversation
Assumptions
The constants behind the number. Your own analytics beats every one of them — overrule away.
At 3 at a time, that is 2.0 minutes of paid time per conversation.
Threads one person runs in parallel. A higher number flatters us, so it starts low.
Your own inbox timestamps beat every published figure for this one.
The thin slice of out-of-hours messages that are new enquiries going elsewhere first — most are existing customers, happy to wait. Only used if you price a customer.
Where every number came from.
The defaults, and why
| Assumption | Starts at | Why | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| What one person costs a year | $62,000 | Median US customer-service pay is $44,770; benefits and payroll taxes add 29.7%. The loaded cost is what finance counts, not the salary line.US Bureau of Labor Statistics — OOH (May 2025) and ECEC (June 2025) | High |
| Share the agent handles end-to-end | 30% | Deliberately low. Vendors publish 60–80%; public case studies run 26–56%. A tuned agent on narrow work beats 30% — that is the upside, not the promise.Metrigy 2024–25 study; published Gorgias case studies; Intercom’s own guidance to new customers | Medium |
| Minutes to handle one conversation | 6 minutes | The middle of the 6–7 minutes reported for chat and messaging. Your analytics has the real number.Cross-industry customer-service benchmarking, 2024–25 | Medium |
| Conversations handled at once | 3 | Two to three threads at once is typical; high performers reach six. It divides handle time, so a higher number would flatter us.Live-chat concurrency benchmarks (HDI, Comm100, Call Centre Helper), 2022–25 | Medium |
| Share arriving out of hours | 30% | Published figures run 40–60%, none traceable to a primary study, so we start below the range. Your inbox timestamps beat all of it.Vendor and vertical reports, 2024–26 — no primary study located | Illustrative |
Primary sources
- US Bureau of Labor Statistics — Occupational Outlook Handbook
- US Bureau of Labor Statistics — Employer Costs for Employee Compensation
- Gartner — AI and customer service staffing (December 2025)
- Gartner — self-service resolution (August 2024)
- Metrigy — the evolving role of AI in customer experience
- Meta — WhatsApp Business Platform pricing
And five we threw out
Each of these circulates widely in this category. Each broke when we chased it to its source, and none is in the arithmetic above.
“WhatsApp has a 98% open rate” (and the identical 98% for SMS)
Two unrelated channels, the same round number, no study behind either. The best real measurement puts WhatsApp nearer 79%.
“AI deflects 45% of queries but only 14% are fully resolved”
Gartner's 14% is real. The 45% comes from the same survey but counts people who felt misunderstood; aggregators stitched the two into a statistic Gartner never published.
“Reply in 5 minutes and you are 21× more likely to qualify a lead”
A vendor-funded 2007 study, never peer-reviewed, routinely misattributed to a 2011 Harvard Business Review article. Nineteen years old, and about outbound phone calls.
“Poor customer service costs US businesses $75 billion a year”
A decade-old round number with no locatable source. Impressive, unusable.
“62% of small business calls go unanswered”
Three mutually exclusive attributions for one figure, one of them a survey of 85 businesses. Copied, not measured.
The awkward questions.
Why start at 30% automation when vendors advertise 80%?
What exactly counts as a conversation?
Is the revenue figure your estimate or mine?
Does the plan price here match what I would actually pay?
What is not counted here?
Find out on your
own inbox.
Point the agent at your own content, watch a week of real conversations, and measure its share against the 30% this page assumed.